The ENVS Experience

Blake Slattengren's Student Site

  • Courses
    • ENVS 160
      • Synthesis Posts
      • All Posts
    • ENVS 220
      • Synthesis Posts
      • Lab Posts
      • All Posts
    • ENVS 330
      • Goal Posts
      • Normative Research Project
      • Research Proposals
      • All Posts
    • ENVS 499
      • All Posts
    • SOAN 110
      • All Posts
  • Projects
    • Unsettling Sustainability
    • Urban Green Spaces and Development in Portland
    • Second Hand Stores in Portland: An Analysis of Consumer Values on Yelp
  • Concentration
  • Capstone
    • Portfolio
    • Actor Network Map
    • Annotated Sources
  • All Posts
  • About
You are here: Home / Posts / ENVS 220 / 220 Synthesis Posts / Ecotypes and Identities

Ecotypes and Identities

November 30, 2015 By Blake Slattengren

Reading a whole bunch of different articles about various “Ecotypes”, or environmental values, has been certainly interesting, but it also left me wondering what the point of it was. They all seemed to say the same thing: there are x number of boxes to lump environmental identities into. Either you can be bright, light, or dark green (or grey) and you’re either a ecomodernist, smart growth reformer, or an ecological activist. Similar, to the enjoyment of categorizing musicians by genre or artists by movement, its definitely fun to lump together people through shared ideas. It also could provide information on trends in environmentalism and maybe showing where movement is happening, if more people are becoming bright greens or what not, but I am still left wondering what solutions this leads to.

While the articles we looked at did not the ‘successfulness’ of each categorization, but this could be something that would be practical and interesting. However, it would be very difficult to find a way to measure each identity as some favor large policy changes and while others favor developing new technologies or advocate for grassroots movements. The number of people who identify with each term could provide some indication, but this also reflects the movers and shakers of each category as much as changes implemented.

Another reason why I find Ecotypes difficult to analyze is that it is merely an identity. Identities are surely important, but they are also just boxes to ascribe people to or for people to claim. They are more group guidelines than actuality. In actuality, people are more of an individual subjectivity, a perspective to view the world that may take on the characteristics of several, even contradicting, identities. Someone can find things to agree about with both bright and dark green identities, or ecomodernist and smart growth reformers. Identities are great to show shared ideas and trends, but aren’t too great at reflecting a reality.

This makes Ecotypes a confusing topic to study: I find them very interesting and love seeing where I fall into these boxes (mostly bright green and ecomodernist by the way), but I’m still struggling to find their practicality. I hope to revisit this with a better understanding later. If nothing else though, they make it much easier to understand the modern environmental movement.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: 220 Synthesis Posts Tagged With: Ecotypes, Identities

About Me

I am an undergrad student at Lewis and Clark college majoring in Environmental Studies and minoring in Chemistry. You can read all about my studies and adventures here.

View My Blog Posts
Mt Rainer, WA
Seattle, WA
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
Mt Defiance, WA
Lookout Mt, WA
Mt Dickerman, WA
Seattle, WA
Portland, OR
Pendelton, OR
Canyonlands, UT
Delicate Arch, UT
Flower in Moab, UT
Parma, ID
Alpine Lakes Wilderness, WA
Seattle, WA

Post Categories

  • Posts (97)
    • Concentration (15)
    • ENVS 160 (13)
    • ENVS 220 (30)
      • 220 Synthesis Posts (19)
      • ENVS Lab (8)
      • PDX Project (6)
    • ENVS 330 (14)
      • Goal Posts (6)
      • Normative Research Project (2)
      • Research Proposals (3)
    • ENVS 400 (12)
    • ENVS 499 (6)
    • Other (12)
    • SOAN 110 (5)

Old Posts

  • December 2017 (3)
  • November 2017 (4)
  • October 2017 (5)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (3)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (6)
  • March 2016 (7)
  • February 2016 (6)
  • January 2016 (4)
  • December 2015 (5)
  • November 2015 (11)
  • October 2015 (14)
  • September 2015 (7)
  • April 2015 (5)
  • March 2015 (4)
  • February 2015 (4)

Tags

Agriculture AgTech Anthropocene anthropology Autonomous Technology Big Data brainstorming California Capstone Concentration Conducting Research Environment Across Boundaries Environmental Literature Environmental Theory ENVX Equity Food Framing Question GIS GMOs Interviews Kale Lab Report Lewis and Clark Midterm Reflections Nature PDX place Precision Farming Purity Questions Research Outline scale Startups statistics Sustainability Assessment Sustainability in Higher Education Symposium Technology Tech of the Future The World Without Us Urban Greenspaces urbanization western apache Wilderness

Digital Scholarship Multisite © 2018 · Lewis & Clark College · Log in