The ENVS Experience

Blake Slattengren's Student Site

  • Courses
    • ENVS 160
      • Synthesis Posts
      • All Posts
    • ENVS 220
      • Synthesis Posts
      • Lab Posts
      • All Posts
    • ENVS 330
      • Goal Posts
      • Normative Research Project
      • Research Proposals
      • All Posts
    • ENVS 499
      • All Posts
    • SOAN 110
      • All Posts
  • Projects
    • Unsettling Sustainability
    • Urban Green Spaces and Development in Portland
    • Second Hand Stores in Portland: An Analysis of Consumer Values on Yelp
  • Concentration
  • Capstone
    • Portfolio
    • Actor Network Map
    • Annotated Sources
  • All Posts
  • About
You are here: Home / Posts / ENVS 400 / Notes From Data Collection

Notes From Data Collection

December 2, 2017 By Blake Slattengren

I am currently in the middle of data collection, digging through Crunchbase finding Ag Data and Precision Ag companies. I have just about wrapped up California companies, finding and coding for 24 different companies. However, three of these companies were no longer active or difficult to find data for and four companies focused on something other than industrial agriculture such as aquaculture or livestock. This leaves 17 fully-coded and functional companies. I was hoping for a few more, but I think this will still be enough for some interesting analysis. The following are interesting trends I noticed in data collection:

  • Unexpectedly, there are a lot of companies that discuss empowering farmers and reducing inequalities. This goes against many concerns in the research I have done about big data technologies increasing inequalities, in agriculture and elsewhere. Some of these comments discuss national inequalities in Farmers (Farmers Business Network) and some discus international inequalities between farmers (Slantrange, Harvesting Inc). I will have to think more about the implications of the comments presented to see if they really address equality concerns.
  • With a couple of exceptions, all of the companies I have looked at so far have been founded in the past 5 years, with 2014 being the most common year. This surprised me with just how recent a trend this is.
  • Another interesting trend is how companies advertise a reduction in labor needs as a result of these technologies. Some write about the labor costs one saves: “Save up to 4 hours/month by eliminating manual data entry for utility bills or manually reading water usage” (OnFarm). Others talk about how this makes your farm “scalable” without adding additional labor: “Scale your labor force without adding boots on the ground” (Mavrx). Obviously, none of these companies go into the impacts on the actual workers, many with reduced hours or out of a job.
  • In general, it seems that bigger companies focus more on sustainable development values while smaller companies focus more on their technology. It would be interesting to test this during data analysis.

I hope to explore all of the above during data analysis to see if these are quantifiable trends and could lead to interesting conclusions. Next, I will do the same procedure for all Ag Data and Precision Ag companies I can find in India. Then, I will choose a company from each location for a deeper narrative analysis. I am trying to finish this in the next several days and then be able to run statistical analysis.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: ENVS 400 Tagged With: AgTech, Conducting Research, Equity, Startups

About Me

I am an undergrad student at Lewis and Clark college majoring in Environmental Studies and minoring in Chemistry. You can read all about my studies and adventures here.

View My Blog Posts
Mt Rainer, WA
Seattle, WA
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
Mt Defiance, WA
Lookout Mt, WA
Mt Dickerman, WA
Seattle, WA
Portland, OR
Pendelton, OR
Canyonlands, UT
Delicate Arch, UT
Flower in Moab, UT
Parma, ID
Alpine Lakes Wilderness, WA
Seattle, WA

Post Categories

  • Posts (97)
    • Concentration (15)
    • ENVS 160 (13)
    • ENVS 220 (30)
      • 220 Synthesis Posts (19)
      • ENVS Lab (8)
      • PDX Project (6)
    • ENVS 330 (14)
      • Goal Posts (6)
      • Normative Research Project (2)
      • Research Proposals (3)
    • ENVS 400 (12)
    • ENVS 499 (6)
    • Other (12)
    • SOAN 110 (5)

Old Posts

  • December 2017 (3)
  • November 2017 (4)
  • October 2017 (5)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • January 2017 (3)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (4)
  • April 2016 (6)
  • March 2016 (7)
  • February 2016 (6)
  • January 2016 (4)
  • December 2015 (5)
  • November 2015 (11)
  • October 2015 (14)
  • September 2015 (7)
  • April 2015 (5)
  • March 2015 (4)
  • February 2015 (4)

Tags

Agriculture AgTech Anthropocene anthropology Autonomous Technology Big Data brainstorming California Capstone Concentration Conducting Research Environment Across Boundaries Environmental Literature Environmental Theory ENVX Equity Food Framing Question GIS GMOs Interviews Kale Lab Report Lewis and Clark Midterm Reflections Nature PDX place Precision Farming Purity Questions Research Outline scale Startups statistics Sustainability Assessment Sustainability in Higher Education Symposium Technology Tech of the Future The World Without Us Urban Greenspaces urbanization western apache Wilderness

Digital Scholarship Multisite © 2018 · Lewis & Clark College · Log in