Laurel Garrett

Lewis and Clark Environmental Studies

  • Home
  • About
    • Me
    • Contact me
  • Courses
    • ENVS 330
    • Thesis
    • Tutor Training
  • Research
    • All Posts
    • Vietnam Study Abroad
    • Portland Carbon Tax
    • Clouds & Climate
    • Concentration

January 15, 2016 By Laurel Garrett

On my ever expanding reading list

I am trying to focus science studies specifically on meteorology, although I should look for some climate ones too. Here is my reading list for the weekend!
Majdik, Zoltan P., Carrie Anne Platt, and Mark Meister. 2011. “Calculating the Weather: Deductive Reasoning and Disciplinary Telos in Cleveland Abbe’s Rhetorical Transformation of Meteorology.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 97 (1): 74–99. doi:10.1080/00335630.2010.539622.

This paper explores the rhetorical basis of a major paradigm change in meteorology, from a focus on inductive observation to deductive, mathematical reasoning. Analysis of Cleveland Abbe’s ‘‘The Physical Basis of Long-Range Weather Forecasts’’ demonstrates how in his advocacy for a new paradigm, Abbe navigates the tension between piety to tradition and dissent necessary for innovation through the rhetorical imagination of and appeal to a disciplinary telos. This strategy allows him to dismiss the traditions of meteorology while simultaneously creating common ground between a new paradigm and an audience of contemporary scientists whose traditions he rejects.

ON CLIMATE
Bray, Dennis, and Hans von Storch. 1999. “Climate Science: An Empirical Example of Postnormal Science.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 80 (3): 439–55. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0439:CSAEEO>2.0.CO;2.

ON INTERDISCIPLINARY EARTH SYSTEMS SCIENCE and COMMUNICATION (for further study and Implications?)

Lohmann, Gerrit. 2015. “Progress in Earth System Science: What Does It Take to Make Our Ideas Clear?” In Towards an Interdisciplinary Approach in Earth System Science, edited by Gerrit Lohmann, Helge Meggers, Vikram Unnithan, Dieter Wolf-Gladrow, Justus Notholt, and Astrid Bracher, 25–35. Springer Earth System Sciences. Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-13865-7_4.
From The Nature of Classification: Relationships and Kinds in the Natural Sciences By John S. Wilkins, Malte C. Ebach
From The Nature of Classification: Relationships and Kinds in the Natural Sciences By John S. Wilkins, Malte C. Ebach
I don’t think I will fully ready the following, but I think the image above from it is pretty self explanatory and could relate well to how I describe my research.
Wilkins, John S., and Malte C. Ebach. 2013. The Nature of Classification: Relationships and Kinds in the Natural Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Thesis

Actinoform_OpenCell_Clouds_MODIS_30sep05
1024px-Wave_cloud
15876886032_2106969550_b
sky_imager

Thesis

  • Summary
  • Thesis Outcomes
  • Outline
  • Background
  • Research Questions
  • Situated Context
  • Methodology
  • Conclusion
  • Bibliography
  • Post Archive

Copyright © 2018 ·Altitude Pro Theme · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress · Log in

✖