Tasha Addington-Ferris

  • About
  • Courses
    • Environmental Analysis
    • Environmental Theory
    • (Un)natural Disasters
    • Situating Environmental Problems and Solutions
  • Concentration
  • Projects
    • Cascadia Earthquake Preparedness Community Outreach Project
    • #Portland: Branding City Aesthetics Through Social Media
    • Nuclear Power – Resilient or Not?
    • Objects of Oppression: How Different Perspectives of Logging have Affected Douglas County
    • An Introduction to Community Gardens in Portland
  • Thesis
  • Posts

Triple Disaster: possible thesis outline

April 13, 2017 By Tasha Addington-Ferris Leave a Comment

Framing: To what extent is nuclear power a resilient power source?

Focus: Did community behaviors in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear meltdown reflect resiliency to nuclear power disaster?  If so, how?

  • Background
    • Resilience
      • Definition – (Benson and Craig 2014) and others
      • Theory – Disaster Resilience? – (Wisner et. al. 2011)
    • Risk association/communication
      • Definition (TBD)
      • Theories – (Jasanoff 1988) “Right-to-know” (RTK),
    • Nuclear power
      • Three major risks: waste, nuclear proliferation, technological disaster (radiation)
        • Include brief key pros and cons
      • Quick summary of Chernobyl and Three Mile Island (World Nuclear Association?)
        • What happened
        • Key takeaways from each disaster – what do they mean for current industry?
      • Security and Trust? – is this relevant?
        • Global NP industry built on foundation of secrecy and alternative motives
  • Situated Context
    • How did Japan start NP industry after bombing?
      • Energy security and pro-nuclear resource discourse (Kinefuchi 2015) (Sato 2007)
      • Nuclear culture – astro boy, etc. (Szasz 2007)
    • Specifics of Fukushima Daiichi plant (World Nuclear Association)
      • What type of plant, associated risks, information shared with public pre-disaster (Based on Jasanoff’s RTK framework)
    • Why Japan?  Why Fukushima – what happened in the triple disaster?
      • Earthquake strength, maybe map of EQ location, range, etc., as well as map of tsunami inundation zone
    • What Japan has that other country’s don’t
      • Earthquake culture (yet maybe not yet with NP plants?)
      • Large number of NP plants (3rd in world)
      • Experience with Nuclear disaster of other kinds (bombings)
  • Methods
    • Book analysis and news source coding
      • First person stories, diary entries, community news vs. national/international news
    • Refugee movement data – evacuation, resettlement, restoration
      • GPS data, population census data
      • Paired with radiation mapping
      • Resettlement data numbers
    • Twitter mapping??
      • Local and global impressions of disaster, perhaps compared with just tsunami regions
  • Results
    • Resilience Profiles filled in using methods listed above
      • Tsunami towns x2, Nuclear and Tsunami towns x2
  • Discussion
    • Relate our results to background
    • What does the resiliency profile tell us? – how can these profiles be implemented in other contexts?
  • Conclusion
    • Broader implications
    • Further research
    • What documentation is missing

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Nuclear Power, Posts

You must log in to post a comment.

Contact

taddington-ferris@lclark.edu

Digital Scholarship Multisite © 2018 · Lewis & Clark College · Log in