Environmental Dilemmas

Investigations by Lydia Bleifuss

  • A B O U T
  • T H E S I S
  • P R O J E C T S
    • Transboundary Watershed Comparative Study
    • Grand Canyon Escalade Proposal
  • P O S T S
  • A R C H I V E
    • Waterkeeper Alliance Southwest Threats Assessment
    • Conflicts Over Surface Water Projects in Newly Industrialized Countries
    • Water’s Influence on Historical and Current Inequalities within Tibet
    • Mountain Biking in Riverview Natural Area
    • Barriers to Energy Adoption in Portland
      • Qualitative Analysis
      • Statistical Analysis
    • Indonesia’s Environmental State
      • Environmental Analysis
      • Mapping Environmental Data
    • Technology and Environment
  • C O U R S E S

Digital Scholarship Multisite © 2018 · Lewis & Clark College · Log in

You are here: Home / chile-thesis-posts / Who Owns the Rivers?

Who Owns the Rivers?

November 4, 2015 By Lydia Bleifuss

Water law and allocation management is different in every country. As far as the U.S. is concerned, water management systems can vary from state to state. This reality seems to be in direct conflict with the nature of water and specifically rivers, in that they move and flow in a sort of continuum. This continuum is constantly altered by hundreds of different factors, organic and man-made, direct and indirect. Such an intricate system became even more complex with the discovery of water’s power in terms of human use. Through hydropower, economic gain became a reality, and through this, political authority.

Large energy corporations have developed an extensive international reach. They have become some of the most powerful players in terms of the global market, but also political systems. In terms of Chile, Empresa Nacional de Electricidad SA, or ENDESA, has developed and attempted to develop a variety of large hydro projects. Although ENDESA is Chile’s largest utility company, it also works in thirty other countries. Furthermore, ENDESA is a subsidiary of the Italian conglomerate ENEL, National Entity for Electricity, which is privatized.

It is becoming more clear to me that throughout the development of my thesis, especially regarding the more broad introductions to the water management sector, I will need to gain a more thorough understanding of this spider web of energy authorities.

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: chile-thesis-posts, Posts

DSC_0496
IMG_3195
IMG_3138
DSC_0627
DSC_0604
IMG_3196
DSC_0575
IMG_6480
DSC_0560
DSC_0493
DSC_0511
DSC_0530
IMG_3197
IMG_6135
DSC_0558
DSC_0483
DSC_0478
DSC_0365
DSC_0337
DSC_0121
DSC_0116
IMG_6481
DSC_0059
DSC_0045
DSC_0028
IMG_6140

M E N U

  • ABSTRACT
    • PDF
    • Poster
  • INTRODUCTION
    • Hydropower Infrastructure and Impact
    • The Hydrosocial Cycle and Hydropower
    • Political Ecology of Neoliberal Management and Private Development
    • Political Ecology of Social Responses to River Development
  • CHILE
    • Hydropower Context
    • Developments
      • Bío Bío
      • Baker and Pascua
      • Futaleufú
      • Puelo
      • Maipo
    • Resistance Strategy Inferences
      • Small-Scale Development
      • Political Reform
      • Responsibility and Forward Momentum
  • BROADER IMPLICATIONS
  • Interviews
  • References
  • Running Posts
  • RESOURCES
    • Futaleufú Riverkeeper
    • Alto Maipo
    • No Alto Maipo
    • Kayak River Stewards of Chile