Environmental Dilemmas

Investigations by Lydia Bleifuss

  • A B O U T
  • T H E S I S
  • P R O J E C T S
    • Transboundary Watershed Comparative Study
    • Grand Canyon Escalade Proposal
  • P O S T S
  • A R C H I V E
    • Waterkeeper Alliance Southwest Threats Assessment
    • Conflicts Over Surface Water Projects in Newly Industrialized Countries
    • Water’s Influence on Historical and Current Inequalities within Tibet
    • Mountain Biking in Riverview Natural Area
    • Barriers to Energy Adoption in Portland
      • Qualitative Analysis
      • Statistical Analysis
    • Indonesia’s Environmental State
      • Environmental Analysis
      • Mapping Environmental Data
    • Technology and Environment
  • C O U R S E S

Digital Scholarship Multisite © 2018 · Lewis & Clark College · Log in

You are here: Home / Posts / Scarcity: Catalyzing Transboundary Cooperation

Scarcity: Catalyzing Transboundary Cooperation

April 22, 2015 By Lydia Bleifuss

“Whiskey’s for drinking, and water is for fighting,” or is it? This quote, attributed to Mark Twain, is largely being proven inaccurate. After researching the broader and conclusive portion of my project, I found an extraordinary amount of evidence which points to transboundary watershed cooperation. By investigating directly within national water ministry’s databases for information, current treaties and their exact purposes were more easily discovered. However, while major bilateral and multilateral initiatives have been enacted in multiple major watershed’s management systems, many of which take climate variability concerns into account, few have utilized enough specificity for such treaties to be effective in the long term. For example, while some nations have agreed to specific adaptive allocations, determined by annual water levels, many have only promised general cooperation with no substantive enforcement procedures. If inefficient allocation persists, in combination with growing climate issues, especially in regards to drought, such facades of adaptive collaboration will crumble for transboundary watershed management systems.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Posts, Watershed Comparison 499

M E N U

  • STUDY INTRODUCTION
  • COMPARISON GUIDE
    • Transboundary Background
      • Historical Context: Colorado
      • Historical Context: Brahmaputra
        • Focussed Assessment
    • Broader Implications
  • RUNNING POSTS
  • REFERENCES
  • RESOURCES
    • Actor Map
    • Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database