Researcher(s):
Gabby Francolla
ENVS course(s): 400 Initiated: September 2017 Completed: May 2018 Go to project site
|
My thesis explores the implications of merging science and values for endangered species conservation in this convoluted era when the relationship between humans and nature is more muddled than ever. The following question frames this research: how does conservation need to change to better protect endangered species in the Anthropocene? I incorporate theories of the social construction of science and nature, environmental ethics, the significance of politicized landscapes, and wicked problems/clumsy solutions to address this question. Focusing on the Columbia River and the tension among conservationists surrounding wild salmon vs. hatchery salmon helps to better consider larger dichotomies in conservation that have hindered the movement by oversimplifying nature. I consider how natural spaces are inherently social spaces where tensions over conservation are simultaneously tensions between groups of people competing for various forms of power. An analysis of the values of four salmon conservation organizations reveals that the lines between science/values and nature/humans must be blurred for a more comprehensive and realistic understanding of nature and consequently more effective plans to conserve it. Ultimately I explain the futility of using science alone in conservation decisions and the importance of acknowledging and embracing distinct values of nature to move beyond wicked problems, all for more successful and less contentious endangered species conservation.